Today, Rep. Charlie Rangel was awarded censure as punishment for his crimes. This recommendation of punishment can be made more or less severe by the full House. Now, how many people really think the House will go along with censure, much less increase the severity of his punishment? Even if his recommended punishment is accepted by the full House, do you really think the Speaker of the House (better known as The Witch of The West) is going to give him much of a rebuke before his colleagues? No way.
This convicted crook had the temerity to say to the committee "....see your way clear to say, 'This member was not corrupt.'"!! Sure, he is not corrupt by his standards, which are the standards of the progressive left. I am shocked, shocked I say, the committee recommended censure. But I feel certain the full House will correct that biased result. Old Charlie is probably counting on this. He is a sly old fox.
The Old Faker put on a grand finale after hearing the verdict. He stood up and said in a voice that was barely audible: "I don't know how much longer I have to live." Just what does that have to do with him being a convicted cheat? It sort of reminds me of old Fred Sanford, of the TV series "Sanford and Son."
Every time Fred wanted a little sympathy he always had his fake heart attack and said, "Oh, oh, its the big one!! You hear that Elizabeth? I'm coming to join you honey." This guy is pathetic. Too bad he was just re-elected for another term. This is a prime example of the need for term limits. These people get re-elected a few times and they think they are totally invincible. Separate from his constituents, much too important to be concerned with laws that are meant for ordinary folks.
Ahhh, what an interesting year of politics this has been. But, God willing, the more interesting times are to come. Like November 2012.